Sense of effort is distorted in people with chronic low back pain

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Available online 2 April 2021, 102376
Michel W. Coppieters

Highlights

• Sense of effort is an important but rarely researched aspect of proprioception.
• We developed a novel force-matching paradigm for back muscles to test sense of effort.
• Sense of effort is affected in people with low back pain.
• People with low back pain overestimate the trunk extension force they generate.
• Patients match forces accurately when sense of effort deficit can be compensated.

Abstract

Background: Proprioceptive deficits in people with low back pain (LBP) have traditionally been attributed to altered paraspinal muscle spindle afference and its central processing. Studies conducted in the upper limb demonstrated that sense of effort is also an important source of kinaesthetic information. Objectives: To better understand proprioceptive deficits in people with chronic LBP (cLBP), this study aimed to test whether sense of effort is affected in people with cLBP. Design: Cross-sectional study. Method: Fourteen participants with cLBP and fourteen healthy participants performed a 120 second force matching task with their trunk extensor muscles at a low intensity. Results: When visual feedback of the generated force was provided, both groups performed the task accurately. Removal of visual feedback resulted in an increase in error for both groups (p<0.0001), but the increase in error was significantly larger for the cLBP group (p=0.023). This larger error could be attributed to undershooting of the target force (p=0.020). The control group did not consistently undershoot or overshoot the target force (p=0.93). Furthermore, the amount of undershooting for the cLBP group increased as the task progressed (p=0.016), which was not observed for the control group (p=0.80). Conclusions: The results of this study revealed that sense of effort is affected in cLBP. People with cLBP overestimated the trunk extension force they generated, and the error increased as the trial progressed. With visual feedback however, people with cLBP were able to compensate and perform the task as accurately as people without cLBP.

Journal Article

Comments Are Closed