Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections vs Placebo on Ankle Symptoms and Function in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis

October 26, 2021
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Liam D. A. Paget, MD
JAMA. 2021;326(16):1595-1605. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.16602

Key Points

Question  Do intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections improve ankle symptoms and function in patients with ankle osteoarthritis?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial that included 100 patients, treatment with 2 intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections vs placebo injections with saline resulted in a mean change in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate less pain and better function) of 10 vs 11 points over 26 weeks; the between-group difference was not statistically significant.

Meaning  These findings do not support the use of platelet-rich plasma injections for patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Importance  Approximately 3.4% of adults have ankle (tibiotalar) osteoarthritis and, among younger patients, ankle osteoarthritis is more common than knee and hip osteoarthritis. Few effective nonsurgical interventions exist, but platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are widely used, with some evidence of efficacy in knee osteoarthritis.

Objective  To determine the effect of PRP injections on symptoms and function in patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A multicenter, block-randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial performed at 6 sites in the Netherlands that included 100 patients with pain greater than 40 on a visual analog scale (range, 0-100) and tibiotalar joint space narrowing. Enrollment began on August 24, 2018, and follow-up was completed on December 3, 2020.

Interventions  Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 ultrasonography-guided intra-articular injections of either PRP (n = 48) or placebo (saline; n = 52).

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the validated American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate less pain and better function; minimal clinically important difference, 12 points) over 26 weeks.

Results  Among 100 randomized patients (mean age, 56 years; 45 [45%] women), no patients were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome. Compared with baseline values, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved by 10 points in the PRP group (from 63 to 73 points [95% CI, 6-14]; P < .001) and 11 points in the placebo group (from 64 to 75 points [95% CI, 7-15]; P < .001). The adjusted between-group difference over 26 weeks was −1 ([95% CI, –6 to 3]; P = .56). One serious adverse event was reported in the placebo group, which was unrelated to the intervention; there were 13 other adverse events in the PRP group and 8 in the placebo group.

Conclusions and Relevance  Among patients with ankle osteoarthritis, intra-articular PRP injections, compared with placebo injections, did not significantly improve ankle symptoms and function over 26 weeks. The results of this study do not support the use of PRP injections for ankle osteoarthritis.

Trial Registration  Netherlands Trial Register: NTR7261

Journal Reference

Comments Are Closed